MANAGING
GRIEF BETTER: PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES
Professor Sheila Hollins
Part of life is dealing with one's losses and grieving. We have
social structures, support systems, teachings and rituals that
help us understand and recover from significant loss. It is not
uncommon for adults to feel they must protect others from these
difficulties including children, elderly people and persons with
disabilities. In fact, strenuous efforts are often made to protect
people with intellectual disabilities from life's losses and disappointments.
The harsh reality of their own and their parents' mortality is
a secret they will have been judged too vulnerable to be told.
Their death education has often been non-existent, so their bewilderment
at the disappearance of a loved one should be no surprise. It
is imperative that all people be able to access the supports given
in their culture to understand death and loss. Protecting someone
usually results in more problems in that grief and mourning will
not be properly experienced, leading to more significant future
difficulties.
In trying to understand how the needs of someone with an intellectual
disability might be similar or different to yours and mine, the
context in which they have lived their lives must be considered.
A very typical situation, for example, is that of a middle-aged
person with an intellectual disability living in a dependent relationship
with ageing parents. The family is often isolated with few friends
and little practical support at home. Their adult son or daughter
may have a regular daytime occupation, and be accustomed to staying
in a respite care home or hostel from time to time. Many adult
sons and daughters with an intellectual disability play an important
role in domestic affairs at home, with dependency being very much
a two-way matter. When their first parent dies, they may not be
told directly of the death. Nevertheless, they will be aware of
their parent's absence, of sadness in the family, and of whispered
conversations and concern about themselves.
 |
While the rest of the family grieves, emergency
admission to respite care or an unexpected holiday with distant
relatives may be arranged for the person with an intellectual
disability. Thus, the person is excluded and kept ignorant
of facts that he or she needs to know. Their confusion and
fear persists when other family members are coming to terms
with their loss. Families comfort themselves with the hope
that the person with an intellectual disability has not noticed
or say, "we could not take her to the funeral - she'd
be too upset," as if being at a funeral was inappropriate.
|
"Denial" of the loss by the person with an intellectual
disability at the time is not surprising in these circumstances.
The individual's ordinary routines and certainties will have been
turned upside down. Prolonged searching behaviour and an increase
in separation anxiety can be expected. However, angry and aggressive
reactions may be delayed to such a degree that, when such behaviour
does occur, no relationship to the loss is recognised.
A second scenario is seen when the surviving parent dies. The
bereaved, dependent person is admitted to emergency care but never
returns home. At one stroke, he or she has lost parent and confidante,
home and possessions, a familiar neighbourhood and routines, and
perhaps a pet. Searching for the lost parent and home is difficult
unless one is able to explain one's needs and unless a new caregiver
is willing to help. In my experience, most caregivers do not recognise
emotional needs such as these. A loss of skills, and decreased
joie de vivre may lead to inappropriate and difficult to reverse
decisions about future living arrangements and opportunities.
There are other loss situations which might be experienced by
a resident of a long-term institutional placement. Staff turnover,
the discharge of roommates to community care, the end of weekly
visits by a devoted parent - now dead - and the death of people
one has lived with for many years all go unremarked.
| Intellectual disability is a broad
category which encompasses mild intellectual disability to
profound mental retardation with multiple disabilities. The
greater the handicap, the less likely the individual's grief
will be recognised. Caregivers tend to ignore or misunderstand
the effects of such losses. Research has shown that some people
with intellectual disabilities will have a delayed understanding
of the ageing process. It seems likely that the irreversibility,
universality, and the inevitability of death will all be difficult
concepts to understand, despite many years of experience as
an adult. The capacity to integrate their experiences and
to learn from them will be limited unless sensitive help is
available. |
 |
It is unlikely that the attitudes of a family or of professional
caregivers will change in the period between a death and the funeral.
There is an important advocacy role for doctors, funeral directors,
care managers and social workers who must not be afraid to challenge
caregivers and support providers who make decisions to exclude
the person with a disability from the full grieving process.
The following recommendations are made to assist persons with
disabilities in dealing with death and loss:
POINTS FOR CAREGIVERS OF BEREAVED PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL
DISABILITIES
| - Be honest, include and involve |
| - Listen - be there with the bereaved person |
| - Actively seek out nonverbal rituals |
| - Respect photos and other mementos |
| - Minimise change |
| - Avoid assessment of skills |
| - Assist searching behaviour |
| - Support the observance of anniversaries |
| - Seek bereavement specialists for consultation if behavioural
changes persist |
1. Be honest, include and involve
Many caregivers find themselves quite unable to be honest or to
include and involve the person with a developmental disability.
The person should be offered the choice of whether to attend the
funeral or memorial service. If he or she is unable to choose
directly because of cognitive limitations, it is usually advisable
to involve the person as fully as possible in all the rituals
being arranged.
 |
2. Listen - be there
Being available to listen and provide support is essential.
This must occur immediately after the death, and, most importantly,
also in the weeks and months following. Understanding the
permanence of death comes slowly, thus the person with a developmental
disability may experience delayed grief.
3. Actively seek out nonverbal rituals
The nonverbal rituals with which most cultures surround death
are helpful to many of us. They are particularly helpful to
people with intellectual disabilities who cannot find solace
in the written or spoken word. Counselling picture books may
be helpful in explaining what happens when someone dies. |
4. Respect photos and other
mementoes
In the early stages of a bereavement it is quite common to
avoid pictures and possessions and places which are associated
with the person who died. As time passes, such mementoes may
come to be treasured. Indeed, the reduction in avoidance of
such cues can provide a useful measure toward resolution of
grief. People with an intellectual disability should be helped
to choose some mementoes, and this choice should be offered
again at a later date when some of their emotional pain has
subsided. Sometimes people make unexpected choices, but these
should be respected. |
|
5. Minimise change
It is advisable to minimise changes in routine and changes in
accommodation or of caregivers at a time of grief. As a rule of
thumb, we suggest major changes should be avoided for at least
one year.
6. Avoid assessment
If a caregiver has died, it may seem sensible to assess an individual
in order to "fit" him/her into the best service or support
system. However, this can be the worst time to assess someone
whose behaviour and skills may have regressed because of the emotional
energy being expended on grieving.
7. Assist searching behaviour
By revisiting old haunts and going to the cemetery, caregivers
can assist appropriate searching behaviour to support emotional
recovery. Hoarding behaviour may suggest that more help of this
kind is required. For example, the person who absconds or is found
wandering may be trying to find their lost home and family. Mark
was asked to leave his "group home" of eight years standing
some time after the death of his grandfather from cancer, and
his dog in an accident. Despite not being told of the deaths officially,
he became slow and uncooperative with ordinary routines and went
missing for hours on end. On the second occasion he was found
in a distressed state in a wooded park. His carers asked his parents
to take him away.
Anne moved to a group home after her mother's death. She went
to great lengths to conceal the small possessions she took from
the jackets, purses and bags of visitors to her group home. Staff
knew things would have been hidden in her room and tried to make
light about her behaviour. It seemed she felt cheated about something
as though she was trying to make up for her own loss. The behaviour
stopped after some individual counselling.
8. Support the observance of anniversaries
Anniversaries should be formally observed. Many religions have
formal services a year after someone has died. This is especially
helpful at the time of the anniversary of an important loss.
9. Seek specialists for consultation if behavioural changes
persist
Referrals for consultation with bereavement specialists are typically
made very late. It is important to make referrals, especially
mental health referrals, as soon as any serious grief reactions
are noted, such as aggressive behaviour, persistent irritability,
mutism, loss of skills, inappropriate speech (i.e., asking "where
is Dad?" all the time), self-injury, tearfulness and absconding.
A recent study of the efficacy of volunteer bereavement counselling
and support for people with learning disabilities found significant
improvements in mental health and behaviour. On the other hand,
specialists without specific experience in bereavement did not
achieve the same success.
CONCLUSION
People with disabilities have a right to participate fully in
the grief and mourning process and in all of society's support
systems and rituals associated with these losses. Concerted effort
is needed to offer death education to professionals and to parent
organisations so that they may become familiar with normal grief
reactions and provide proper supports. Death education can be
introduced into the school and adult education curriculum for
people with learning disabilities. Advice is needed to construct
guidelines for special agencies to follow when a death does occur.
This might include helping professional caregivers rehearse breaking
the news of a death. Practical plans to avoid immediate admission
to residential care are required. The importance of ensuring that
the bereaved person has some mementoes of their deceased relative
must be remembered and advice on the importance of nonverbal rituals
at the funeral may be helpful. Bereavement counselling for people
with intellectual disabilities should be made available routinely
and not just when a maladaptive reaction has been recognised as
grief. Both individual and group work with bereaved individuals
may be helpful, particularly if nonverbal approaches, such as
the use of counselling picture books, are available.
REFERENCES
1. Hollins S, Sireling L (2004) When Dad Died, 3rd Edition. London:
Gaskell.
2. Hollins S, Sireling L (2004) When Mum Died, 3rd Edition. London:
Gaskell.
3. Hollins S, Dowling S, Blackman N (2003) When Somebody Dies.
London: Gaskell.
4. Hollins S, Sireling L (eds) (1990) Working Through Loss with
People Who Have Learning Disabilities. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.
5. Kloeppel DA, Hollins S. (1989) Double handicap: Mental retardation
and death in the family. Death Studies 13, 31-38.
6. Stroebe MS, Storebe W, Hansson RO (1993) Handbook of Bereavement.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Raji O, Hollins S, Drinnan, A (2003) How far are people with
learning disabilities involved in funeral rites? British Journal
of Learning Disabilities, 31, 42-45.
This article is a substantially re-written version of one
that appeared in The Habilitative Mental Healthcare Newsletter,
May/June 1995, Vol. 14 No. 3.
| The pictures in this article are by Catherine
Brighton and are taken from When Somebody Dies by Sheila
Hollins, Sandra Dowling and Noelle Blackman. See www.rcpsych.ac.uk/publications/bbw. |
Back to top
|