FETAL
ALCOHOL SPECTRUM DISORDER: AN OVERVIEW.
Raja A S Mukherjee: S Hollins: J Turk.
What are Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders?
Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders is an umbrella
term for a set of disorders caused by the consumption of alcohol
by a mother whilst pregnant.
These conditions range in diversity from the full presentation
of fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS), involving a characteristic set
of facial features combined with growth and neuro-cognitive deficits,
to a range of conditions affecting the neuro-behavioural presentations
of the condition without all these features.

Hogarth 1751: Gin Lane depicting early alcohol abuse and
reported to
depict a baby possibly affected with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders
Box 1 summarises the different clinical criteria used, based
on the Institute of Medicine diagnoses (USA), as well as the common
diagnostic methods used. (1,2).O'Leary (3) recently summarised
the epidemiological research in to fetal alcohol spectrumdisorders
concluding that the estimated worldwide prevalence is around 1
per 100 for fetal alcohol spectrum disorders, making it the most
common cause of intellectual difficulties.
Box 1
Summary of diagnostic categories and methods. (Hoyme 2005). |
| 1. Fetal Alcohol Syndrome : Confirmed alcohol
exposure |
| |
a. |
Alcohol Exposure. |
| |
b. |
Facial pattern of Short palpebral
fissures < / = 10 percentile, Thin upper lip vermillion,
Smooth philtrum. |
| |
c. |
Evidence of pre / postnatal growth
retardation. |
| |
d. |
Evidence of Neurocognitive deficits. |
| 2. Fetal Alcohol Syndrome: No confirmed
alcohol exposure. |
| |
a. |
As above but no alcohol exposure found. |
| 3. Partial Fetal Alcohol syndrome: Confirmed
Alcohol Exposure |
| |
a. |
Not all of the above features are present but
neurocognitive and some facial features needed. |
| 4. Alcohol Related Birth Defect (ARBD) |
| |
a. |
Confirmed maternal alcohol consumption as well
as some but not all of the facial features are present however
the behavioral features or structural abnormalities are more
pronounced. |
| 5. Alcohol Related Neurodevelopmental Disorder
(ARND) |
| |
a. |
Confirmed maternal alcohol consumption with
the absence of growth retardation or facial features and with
the neurocognitive features being prominent. |
Knowledge of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders
Knowledge levels about fetal alcohol spectrum disorders by the
general public and health professionals in the UK are not accurately
known. Most relevant studies have taken place in the USA and Canada
where there is greater general awareness of the disorder. Nanson
et al (4) surveyed a group of paediatricians and general practitioners.
She showed that whilst most people had heard of fetal alcohol
spectrum disorders, less than 50 % knew much about how to recognise
it. 10% of those that did recognise the condition did nothing
about it. Stohler (5) studied 40 high risk pregnancies to see
if fetal alcohol syndrome was detected in the offspring. A specially
trained research assistant identified 16 cases resulting from
these pregnancies. None had been identified by routine paediatric
screening. Further, 73% of the case notes made no record of maternal
alcohol consumption despite the mothers being known to be in a
high risk group.
|
THE FACE OF FETAL ALCOHOL SYNDROME
|
|
|
Kesmodel et al (6) studied a group of pregnant Danish
women. A majority 74% felt that drinking in pregnancy was acceptable
and 65% reported they had received little or no information from
their midwife about possible dangers. This is consistent with
data collected by the UK government in their alcohol reduction
strategy, where it was found that 61% of women drank during pregnancy
to some level (7). MacKinnion (8) studied a group of teenagers
in America. Although 97% had heard of alcohol causing problems
during pregnancy, 48% thought that the condition related to the
baby being addicted to alcohol and just over 50% felt the condition
could be cured. Similar information needs to be collected in the
UK urgently in order to inform health promotion strategies.
Diagram Highlighting the Number of
Units in a Glass
|
| Glass letter |
Volume
mls
|
Alcohol content (%) |
No of units in glass |
Number of glasses needed to have
a binge
(6 units in one sitting) |
| A |
125 |
9 |
1.1 |
5.5 |
| B |
125 |
13 |
1.5 |
4 |
| C |
250 |
9 |
2.3 |
2.5 |
| D |
250 |
13 |
3 |
2 |
Pathology in Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders
Since the naming of fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS)
in 1973 there has been some controversy as to its actual existence.
Further uncertainty persists regarding the level of maternal alcohol
consumption that can cause damage. Evidence for pathogenic mechanisms
comes from mainly animal studies. These have been corroborated
by some human investigations. The difficulty with human research
lies in the ethics of the methodology and the subsequent biases
inherent in available approaches. It is the combination of all
the evidence that has given most insight into the condition's
pathogenesis.
Maier and West (9) suggest that it is the rise in alcohol levels,
as well as the subsequent withdrawal, which cause damage. Both
raised acetaldehyde levels as well as subsequent apoptotic damage
from excess glutamate activity following GABA (gamma amino butyric
acid) withdrawal are implicated. Ikonomidou et al (10) report
that exposure of rat brain to ethanol for a period of hours during
a specific developmental stage induces an apoptotic neurodegenerative
reaction that deletes large neurones from several developing sites.
This process is further complicated by individual genetic differences,
diet, and hormonal interactions as some of the multifaceted risk
factors. Thus prediction of individual risk is particularly difficult
if not impossible. The UK binge drinking culture and lack of awareness
of true drink size by the general public are additional risks
(7,11).

Diagram showing developmental periods during pregnancy
Reports have shown increasingly that there are vulnerable periods
of neonatal development that can be affected by teratogenic ingestion.
In terms of neural development, which occurs throughout pregnancy,
it is often the inter-neuron connections that are damaged. This
is especially the case at lower levels of consumption. Charness
et al (12) report that even at low concentrations of ethanol exposure,
cell adhesion molecules are inhibited. These have subsequent effects
on neuronal migration, fasciculation and synaptogenesis, which
are all vital to the developing brain. These risk factors, as
well as protective factors, need further clarification.
More recently work by Hepper et al(13) using ultrasound monitoring
of fetal behaviour where mothers consumed alcohol at levels within
current UK government guidance showed effects on fetal startle
which did not habituate to a level achieved by those that consumed
no alcohol. They suggest that this is a sign that even at the
low levels of alcohol consumption (an average of 4.3 units per
week +/- 1.9) permanent damage to the developing fetal brains
is occurring.
Neurocognitive deficits & secondary disabilities
Jacobson (14) summarised the cognitive deficits associated classically
with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. These deficits tend to
be life long, and are evident in the absence of facial pathology.
Box 2 summarises the core deficits witnessed. Rasmussen (15) recently
published a systematic review of the executive and working memory
deficits associated with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Further,
it was reported that the severity of these long term core deficits
is independent of the presence of facial features, meaning a diagnosis
of ARND (Alcohol Related Neurodevelopmental Disorder) can be as
debilitating as full fetal alcohol syndrome. In many cases it
can be more because the person may appear superficially not to
have a disability and will be expected to perform to a level of
sophistication and ability they simply cannot manage. Clinical
evidence suggests that this makes individuals more vulnerable
to avoidable serious secondary disabilities.
Streissguth et al (16) have highlighted ongoing secondary difficulties.
Intellectual tests show that average IQ is 85.9 for fetal alcohol
spectrum disorders. This group has an uneven profile of abilities
and disabilities that means their average level of intellectual
functioning is not truly reflective or predictive of their pattern
of cognitive strengths and needs.
|
|
IQ Score
|
WRAT Arithmetic
|
Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scale Score
|
|
Mean
|
SD
|
Mean
|
SD
|
Mean
|
SD
|
|
NON FASD
|
100
|
15
|
100
|
15
|
100
|
15
|
|
FASD
|
85.9
|
16.2
|
74.2
|
16.8
|
64.9
|
16.1
|
They further show this group are vulnerable to
life events. 90% have some form of diagnosable mental disorder.
These can be as diverse as ADHD (attention deficit hyperactivity
disorder), social and communicatory impairments, personality disorder,
schizophrenia, addiction and depression. 50% have some form of
confinement in mental health or criminal justice situations and
50% some form of sexually inappropriate behaviour. Much of this
can be related to their inability to control and maintain their
behaviour attributable to damage caused to their executive function
abilities combined with difficulties in receptive language and
inability to consolidate memories because of temporal / hippocampal
damage.
Management of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders

From Vol. 18, No. 1, 1994 of the Journal Alcohol Health &
Research World
Management of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders classically is
divided into two main areas. Firstly, recognition of the dangers
of alcohol consumption in pregnancy and the prevention of damage
to the fetus. The second area is less well researched but relates
to the management of people who have the condition. The emphasis
on prevention has been the most highly publicised of the two with
numerous authors stressing the level of risk that is harmful,
early detection of at risk mothers, the need for information sharing
between professionals and public as paramount priorities (17,18).
Emerging methods such as the use of routine screening tools such
as TWEAK, hair sampling, or meconium testing have been suggested
(19,20), however the ethical debate around their use is in its
infancy thus clarification is required before they can be recommended
routinely. Research into protective factors during pregnancy has
been inconclusive and contradictory. The use of vitamin E as a
potential antioxidant has been shown beneficial in some studies
and ineffective in others (21,22). Clearly much has still to be
done before conclusive information can be given to mothers contemplating
pregnancy. For this reason we continue to emphasise the general
abstinence message (17).
With regard to children and adults who have fetal alcohol spectrum
disorders, much work has been undertaken to categorise difficulties
and establish diagnoses. Less research has been undertaken relating
to clinical management. This work has mainly involved children
in the United States and Canada. Chudley et al (1) recently reviewed
the Canadian guidance on diagnosing and managing fetal alcohol
spectrum disorders. . They emphasise early recognition and psychometric
testing combined with multidisciplinary intervention approaches.
Much of what can be implemented depends on local resources and
vision. Preconception prevention aspects involve Government and
general practitioners in terms of health promotion and advice,
whilst later general practitioners, obstetricians and others are
needed during the pregnancy in addition to routine antenatal care
to monitor alcohol use and to provide health advice. It is here
that suspected cases can be highlighted and information passed
to colleagues in order to maximise early pickup of problems. Simple,
regular recording of information about alcohol consumption will
facilitate this process and inform future diagnoses. Failure to
do so leads to avoidable difficulties and impairments later.
Further management involves a wide range of health professionals,
many of whom may not be aware of the issues facing them. Clinical
genetics services ( equivalent to clinical dysmorphology services
in other parts of the world) and access to clinical psychology
and speech and language therapy may in some areas be limited.
The provision of specialist schools, whilst useful, is not available
in the UK specifically for fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Those
children in the general special needs school set-up in the UK
anecdotally seem to do better than those who remain in the mainstream.
Unfortunately this remains the minority.
Unlike the situation in America and Canada, where specific, dedicated
fetal alcohol spectrum disorder centres exist, there are very
few fetal alcohol spectrum disorder experts in the UK. Thus obtaining
specialist advice is restricted to the lucky few. As is the case
for many, clinical service funding streams mean that for people
with fetal alcohol syndrome it is not always possible to obtain
what they need. Nonetheless, recognising the condition, obtaining
sufficient early evidence and using resources locally available
in collaboration with multi-professional colleagues can reap important
rewards. By combining these multi-professional agencies in a single
setting, as is the case in other parts of the world, has the outcome
of potentially facilitating a seamless approach to the condition
and the experience for the patient.
The estimated extra cost of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders
in USA in has been estimated at $500,000 per individual over a
20 year period (23). For a condition that can be prevented, increasing
awareness, education and UK based research will help to allow
access to local provisions and could be expected to reduce the
prevalence of the condition as well as the human cost in the future.
Suggestions for further reading
| 1. |
Chudley
AE, Conry J, Cook JL, Loock C,
Rosales T, LeBlanc N. Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder: Canadian
guidelines for diagnosis. Canadian
Medical Association Journal 2005; 172
:S1 – S21 |
| 2. |
Hoyme
HE, May PA, Kalberg
WO, Kodutuwakku P, Gossage
JP, Trujillo PM, et al. A practical clinical approach to the
diagnosis of fetal alcohol spectrum disorder : clarification of the 1996 institute of medicine
criteria. Paediatrics
2005; 115(1): 39
– 47 |
| 3. |
O’Learey
CM. Foetal Alcohol Syndrome; Diagnosis, epidemiology and
developmental outcomes. Journal of Paediatrics
and Child Health 2004; 40:
2-7 |
| 4. |
Nanson
JL, Bolaria R, Snyder RE, Morse BA, Weiner L, Physician awareness
of FAS ; survey of paediatricians
and GP. Canadian Medical
Association Journal 1995 ;152(7)
:1071- 1076 |
| 5. |
Stoler
JM, Holmes LB. Under recognition of prenatal alcohol effects
of infants of known alcohol abusing women. Journal
of Paediatrics 1999 ;135(4): 430 – 436 |
| 6. |
Kesmodel U, Kesmodel PS. Drinking during
pregnancy: attitudes and knowledge among pregnant Danish women
in 1998. Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research
2002 ;26(10):
1553-60 |
| 7. |
Department of Health Strategy Unit. Alcohol harm reduction project: Interim
analytical report DOH London 2003 |
| 8. |
Mackinnon DP, William- Avery RM,
Pentz MA. Youth belief and knowledge about the risks
of drinking while pregnant. PublicHealth Reports 1995; 110(6) :754 – 763 |
| 9. |
Maier SE, West JR.
Drinking patterns and alcohol related birth defects. Alcohol
Research and Health 2001; 25(3) :168 –174 |
| 10. |
Ikonomidou C, Bittagau P, Ishimaru MJ, Woznaik DF, Koch C et al. Ethanol induced apoptic neurodegeneration and
fetal alcohol syndrome. Science 2000; 287: 1056-1060 |
| 11. |
Kaskutas LA, Graves
K. Pre pregnancy drinking: how drink size affects risk assessment.
Addiction 2001;96: 1199-1209 |
| 12. |
Charness ME, Safran RM, Perides G. Ethanol
inhibits neural cell- cell adhesion. Journal of Biological Chemistry 1994; 269(12) :9304-9 |
| 13. |
Hepper PG, Dornan
JC, Little JF,
Maternal alcohol consumption may delay the development
of spontaneous fetal startle behaviour. Physiology and Behaviour 2005; 83 : 711- 714 |
| 14. |
Jacobson JL, Jacobson SW. Effects of prenatal
alcohol exposure on child development. Alcohol
Research and Health 2002; 26(4):
282-286 |
| 15. |
Rasmussen C. Executive functioning and working
memory in fetal alcohol spectrum disorder. Alcoholism:
Clinical and Experimental Research 2005;29 (8) :1359 – 1367 |
| 16. |
Streithguth AP, O’Malley K. Neuropsychiatric implications and long
term consequences of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders Seminars
in Clinical Neuropsychiatry 2000 ;5(3):
177 – 190 |
| 17. |
Mukherjee RAS, Hollins S, Abou
Saleh MT, Turk JT. Low level alcohol
consumption and the fetus. British
Medical Journal 2005; 330:
375-6 |
| 18. |
Valborg KL, Leonardson GR, Borzelleca J,
Brock E, Neff-Smith M, Welty
TK. Characteristics of mothers who have children with fetal
alcohol syndrome or some characteristics of fetal alcohol
syndrome. Journal
American Board of Family Practitioners 2003;16(4): 296-303 |
| 19. |
Russel M. New assessment
tools for risk assessment during pregnancy T-ACE TWEAK and
others. Alcohol Research and Health 1994;
18(1): 55-61 |
| 20. |
Chan D. Meconium fatty acid ethyl esters: an emerging marker.
Journal of Fetal
Alcohol Syndrome International 2003;1:c9 |
| 21. |
Marino MD, Aksenov
MY, Kelly JS. Vitamin E protects against alcohol induced cell
loss oxidative stress in the neonatal rat hippocampus. International
Journal of Developmental Neuroscience
2004;22( 5-6): 363-377 |
| 22. |
Tran TD, Jackson HD, Horn, KH, Goodlett
CR. Vitamin E does not protect against neonatal ethanol induced
cerebellar damage or deficits in eyeblink
classically conditioned rats. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental
Research 2005; 29(1)
:117 – 129 |
| 23. |
Klug MG, Burd L. Foetal alcohol syndrome
prevention: annual and cumulative cost savings Neurotoxicol Teratol
2001: 25; 763 -
65 |
Reproduced from the JRSM, volume 99. 2006 pg 298-302, with permission
from the Royal Society of Medicine Press, London.
The article has been edited by the authors and some illustrations
have been added.
|
Published on this website in March 2007.
|
Back to top
|